Dynamic Learning Environment using a Service-Oriented Architecture

S. Dawson and S. Sezer


  1. [1] T. Lewis , Information appliances: Gadget Netopia, IEEE Computer, 31, 1998, 59–60. doi:10.1109/2.641978
  2. [2] R. Figueiredo, P.A. Dinda, & J.A.B. Fortes, A case for gridcomputing on virtual machines, Proc. Int. Conf. on DistributedComputing Systems, Providence, RI, 2003, 550–559. doi:10.1109/ICDCS.2003.1203506
  3. [3] R. Buyya, Economic-based distributed resource managementand scheduling for grid computing, doctoral diss., MonashUniversity, Melbourne, Australia, 2002.
  4. [4] R. Buyya, D. Abramson, J. Giddy, & H. Stockinger, Economic models for resource management and scheduling in grid computing, Journal of Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 14 (13–15), November-December 2002, 1507–1542. doi:10.1002/cpe.690
  5. [5] E. Meijer & D. Van Velzen, Haskell server pages: Functional programming and the battle for the middle tier, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 41 (1), 2001, http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/volume41.html.
  6. [6] The TimesTen Team, High performance and scalability throughapplication-tier, in-memory data management, Proc. 26th Int.Conf. on Very Large Databases, Cairo, Egypt, 2000, 677–680.
  7. [7] S.W. Han, Three-tier architecture for sentinel applications andtools: Separating presentation and functionality, doctoral diss.,University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 1997.
  8. [8] J. Coco, Maximizing the potential of web services, XML-Journal, 2001. Available from: www.sys-con.com/xml.
  9. [9] D. Pinelle & C.Gutwin, Designing for loose coupling in mobilegroups, Proc. Int. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. on SupportingGroup Work, Sanibel Island, FL, 2003, 75–84. doi:10.1145/958160.958173
  10. [10] G. Guglielmo, Dynamic graphical user interfaces using XMLand JPython, paper presented at the International Conferenceon Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Padova,Italy, 2000.
  11. [11] X. Xiaoqin, X. Peng, L. Juanzi, & W. Kehong, A componentmodel for designing dynamic GUI, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, Chengdu, China, 2003, 136–140.
  12. [12] J. Blair, Grid application design, EAI Journal, June 2003,40–43.
  13. [13] Web Services Description Language 1.1, W3C Note, March2001. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WSDL.html.
  14. [14] IMS Global Learning Consortium. Available from:http://www.imsglobal.org/.
  15. [15] IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. Availablefrom: http://ltsc.ieee.org/.
  16. [16] Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Available from:http://dublincore.org/.
  17. [17] Advanced Distributed Learning Network. Available from:http://www.adlnet.org/.
  18. [18] M. Nilsson, M. Palm´er, & A. Naeve, SemanticWeb meta-datafor e-learning: Some architectural guidelines, Proc. 11th WorldWide Web Conf., Honolulu, HI, 2002, http://www2002.org/CDROM/alternate/744/index.html.
  19. [19] MIT Open Knowledge Initiative. Available from:http://web.mit.edu/oki/.
  20. [20] WS-Discovery. Available from:http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/ws-discovery.pdf.
  21. [21] A. Sahai, J. Ouyang, & V. Machiraju, End-to-end transactionmanagement for composite web based services, 3rd Int. Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-Commerce and Web-Based Information Systems WECWIS ’01, San Juan, CA, June 21–22, 2001, 128–135 . doi:10.1109/WECWIS.2001.933915
  22. [22] WS-Coordination. Available from: http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/ws-standards-coordination.pdf.
  23. [23] WS-Transaction. Available from:ftp://www6.software.ibm.com/software/developer/library/ws-transpec.pdf.
  24. [24] Andy Lang, Web services security, EAI Journal, September2002, 19–23.
  25. [25] XML Signature WG. Available from:http://www.w3.org/Signature/.
  26. [26] SAML Specification. Available from: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/

Important Links:

Go Back