Collaborative Learning based on Web-Shared Objects: A Naturalistic Inquiry Approach

J.I. Icaza and M.A. Pérez-Guardado


  1. [1] M.A. Perez-Guardado, Asynchronous collaborative learningbased on web-shared objects: a naturalistic inquiry case study,doctoral diss., Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, 2003.
  2. [2] J.I. Icaza, Construcción de conocimiento en una empresaeditorial virtual (Knowledge building in a virtual editorialcompany—paper in Spanish), Memorias del XXXI Congreso deInvestigación y Extensión. Tecnológico de Monterrey 2001. Alsoin∼jicaza/papers/104ConstrConocimien.htm, accessed May 2004.
  3. [3] J.I. Icaza, Colaboración y construcción de conocimiento mediante el uso de un Wiki Server (Colaboration and knowledge building using a wiki server—paper in Spanish), Memorias del XVIII Intercambio de experiencias en educación. Tecnológico de Monterrey 2000. Also in∼jicaza/papers/HVCTwikiPaperCrgd.htm, accessed May 2004.
  4. [4] A. Beuchot, Interaction and interpersonal behavior incomputer-mediated academia forums, doctoral diss., ITESM,Monterrey, Mexico, 2001.
  5. [5] M.S. Ackerman & D.W. McDonald, Answer Garden 2: Merging organizational memory with collaborative help, Computer Support Cooperative Work ’96, ACM, Cambridge, MA, 1996, 97–105. doi:10.1145/240080.240203
  6. [6] L. Gomez, R. Fish, S. Bly, Y. Andres, S. Canetti, B. Fishman,& J. Polman, Media spaces and their application in K-12 andcollege learning communities, Proc. of the CHI ’94 Conferenceon Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, 1994, 185–186. doi:10.1145/259963.260236
  7. [7] U. Wolz, H. Walker, Z. Chen, J. Palme, & P. Andersen,Computer-mediated communication in collaborative educational settings: report of the ITiCSE ’97 working group on CMC in collaborative educational settings. Special issue: ITiCSE ’97 working group papers, ACM SIGCUE, 25(4), October 1997, 51–69. doi:10.1145/274382.274385
  8. [8] M. Alavi, Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation, MIS Quarterly, June 1994, 150–174.
  9. [9] S.R. Hiltz, The Virtual Classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1994).
  10. [10] D. Leidner & M. Fuller, Improving student processing andassimilation of conceptual information: GSS-supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning, Proc. of HICSS 29th, Maui, HI, January, 1996, 293–302. doi:10.1109/HICSS.1996.493200
  11. [11] J. Webster & P. Hackley, Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning, Academy of Management Journal,40(6), 1997, 1282–1309. doi:10.2307/257034
  12. [12] J. Fjermestad, S. Hiltz, & M. Turoff, An integrated frameworkfor the study of group decision support systems. HICSS 1993Proceedings, Vol. IV, Maui, HI, 1993, 179–188.
  13. [13] A. Pinsonneault & K.L. Kraemer, The impact of technologicalsupport on groups: An assessment of the empirical research,Decision support systems, 5, 1989, 197–216. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(89)90007-9
  14. [14] J.M. Haake & C. Neuwirth, Collaborative authoring of hypermedia documents, Machine Translation Today, Translating and the Computer, 15, 1993, 41–58.
  15. [15] R. Bentley, W. Appelt, U. Busbach, E. Himrichs, D. Kerr, &K. Sikkel, Basic support for cooperative work on the WorldWide Web, International Journal of Human-computer Studies,46, 1997, 827–846. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0108
  16. [16] T. Nomura, K. Hayashi, T. Hazama, & S. Gudmundson,Interlocus: Workspace configuration mechanisms for activityawareness, Proc. of the CSCW ’98 (ACM Conference), Seattle,WA, 1998, 19–28. doi:10.1145/289444.289453
  17. [17] W. Prinz & S. Kolvenbach, Support for workflows in a ministerial environment, Proc. of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’96 (New York: ACM), 1996, 199–208. doi:10.1145/240080.240254
  18. [18] G. Mark, Merging multiple perspectives in groupware use:Intra- and intergroup conventions, Proc. of the InternationalACM SIGGroup Conference on Supporting Group Work: theIntegration Challenge, ACM Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 1997, 19–28. doi:10.1145/266838.266846
  19. [19] T. Rodden, Populating the application: A model of awarenessfor cooperative applications, Proc. of CSCW ’96 (Boston, MA:ACM), 1996, 87–96. doi:10.1145/240080.240200
  20. [20] M. Shrage, Shared Minds: The new technologies of collaboration(New York, NY: Random House, 1990).
  21. [21] J.M. Haake, Applying collaborative open hypermedia conceptsto extended enterprise engineering and operation, OHS7-The Seventh International Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, Hypertext 2001, University of Åarhus,
  22. [22] R.B. Smith, R. Hixon, & B. Horan, Supporting flexible rolesin a shared space, Proc. of the 1998 ACM Conference onComputer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, 1998, 197–206. doi:10.1145/289444.289494
  23. [23] C.M. Neuwirth, R. Chandhok, D. Charney, P. Wojahn, &L. Kim, Distributed collaborative writing: A comparisonof spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revisingdocuments, Proc. of the CHI ’94 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM, Boston, MA, 1994, 51–57.
  24. [24] M. Sharples, The development of a cognitive model for computer support of collaborative writing, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(3), 1991, 203–204. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00249.x
  25. [25] U. Haha, M. Jarke, K. Kreplin, & M. Farusi, CoAUTHOR: ahypermedia group authoring environment, in J.M. Bowers &S.D. Benford (Eds.), Studies in computer-supported cooperativework: theory, practice and design (New York: North-Holland,1991), 79–100.
  26. [26] L. Ede & A. Lunsford, Singular texts/plural authors: perspectives on collaborative writing (Ewardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990).
  27. [27] C. Chen & R. Rada, Understanding collaborative authoringin shared workspaces, in K. Nordby, P.H. Helmersen, D.J.Gilmore, & S.A. Arnessen (Eds.), Human–Computer Interaction, Interact 95 (London: Chapman & Hall, 1995), 277–282.
  28. [28] A.H. Duin & K.S. Gorak, Developing texts for computers and composition: A collaborative process, Computers and Composition, 9(2), April, 1992, 17–39. Also in http://www.cwrl.utexas. edu/∼ccjrnl/Archives/v9/9_2_html/9_2_2_Duin.html.
  29. [29] J. Houseman, On-line document sharing: Document routing—who does what and how do you pass it around?, Teaching Technologies, 2(3), November 1998, Ottawa, CA: Center for University Teaching. Also in
  30. [30] G. Tintera, Modern Algebra MATH 4306, Texas A&MUniversity-Corpus Christi, TX, Spring 2002. Also in
  31. [31] S. Lewandowki, UMN Course Description, Seminar II, University of Minnesota, 2003. Also in
  32. [32] Wikipedia, Wikipedia Main Page, accessed on Nov. 22, 2003at
  33. [33] M. Schultz, The history of Oticon, in M. Morsing & K. Eiberg(Eds.), Managing the unmanageable for a decade (Hellerup,Denmark: Copenhagen Buss, School Press, 1998).
  34. [34] E. Guba & Y. Lincoln, Naturalistic inquiry (Newbury Park,CA: Sage, 1985).
  35. [35] D. Erlandson, E. Harris, B. Skipper, & S.D. Allen, Doingnaturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods (Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, 1993).
  36. [36] B. Kaplan & J.A. Maxwell, Qualitative research methods forevaluating computer information systems, in G. Anderson, C.E.Aydin, & S.J. Jay (Eds.), Evaluating health care informationsystems: Methods and applications (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,1994), 45–68.
  37. [37] S.B. Merriam, Qualitative research and case study applicationsin education (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998), 5.
  38. [38] G. Delisle, Work report, Department of Microbiology andImmunology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, 2000.Also in
  39. [39] J. Galegher, L. Sproull, & S. Kiesler, Legitimacy, authority,and community in electronic support groups, Written Communication 15, October 1998, 493–530.
  40. [40] K.Y. McKenna & A. Greeen, Virtual group dynamics, Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practices, 6(1), 2002, 116-127. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.116

Important Links:

Go Back