M. Dahl and D.I. Wilson


  1. [1] S.E. Jørgensen, State of the art of ecological modelling in limnology, Ecological Modelling, 78, 1995, 101–115. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(94)00120-7
  2. [2] Statens Naturv˚ardsverk, V¨anern en naturresurs, Rapport, Solna, 1978 (in Swedish with English summary).
  3. [3] O. Bj¨arnek, Myndigheterna mot StoraEnso i miljödomstolen: Vinst kr¨aver mer utsl¨app (Authorities against StoraEnso in the environmental court: Profits require more emissions), Nya Wermlands-Tidningen, January 31, 2000.
  4. [4] L. H˚akanson, Water pollution: Methods and criteria to rank, model and remediate chemical threats to aquatic ecosystems (Leiden: Backhuys, 1999).
  5. [5] M. Dahl, D. Wilson, & L. H˚akanson, Building and validating models of freshwater ecosystems, Proc. IASTED Modelling, Identification and Control Conf., Innsbruck, Austria, Feb. 19–22, 2001, 515–520.
  6. [6] S. Jørgensen, B. Halling-Sørensen, & S.N. Nielsen, Handbook of environmental and ecological modeling (Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996).
  7. [7] M. Dahl & D. Wilson, Current status of freshwater quality models, Tech. report, Karlstad University, May 2000.
  8. [8] E. Rykiel, Testing ecological models: The meaning of validation, Ecological Modelling, 90, 1996, 229–244. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(95)00152-2
  9. [9] M. Dahl, Appropriate modelling complexity: An application to mass-balance modelling of Lake V¨anern, Sweden, doctoral diss., Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden, May 2004.
  10. [10] M. Dahl & D. Wilson, Is Lake V¨anern well mixed? A statistical procedure for selecting model structure and resolution, Journal of Great Lakes Research, 30, February 2004, 267–276.
  11. [11] L. Shampine & M. Reichelt, The MATLAB ODE Suite, Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, Journal on Scientific Computing, 18, 1997, 1–22. doi:10.1137/S1064827594276424
  12. [12] D. Scavia, An ecological model of Lake Ontario, Ecological Modelling, 8, 1980, 49–78. 104 doi:10.1016/0304-3800(80)90029-0

Important Links:

Go Back