AN EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ ONLINE ASSESSMENT PERFORMANCES

A. Flynn, F. Concannon, and M. Campbell

References

  1. [1] C. Dowling, J. Godfrey, & N. Gyles, Do hybrid flexible teachingmethods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes?,Accounting Education, 12(4), 2003, 373–392. doi:10.1080/0963928032000154512
  2. [2] J. Ravitz, CILT2000: Using technology to support ongoingformative assessment in the classroom, Journal of Science,Education and Technology, 11(3), 2002, 293–296. doi:10.1023/A:1016032821506
  3. [3] S.M. Bryant & J.E. Hunton, The use of technology in thedelivery of instruction: Implications for accounting educationresearchers, Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 2000, 129–162.
  4. [4] J.E. Rebele, B.A. Apostolou, F.A. Buckless, J.M. Hassell,L.R. Paquette, & D.E. Stout, Accounting education literature20review (1991–1997), Part II: Students, educational technology,assessment and faculty issues, Journal of Accounting Education,16(2), 1998, 179–245. doi:10.1016/S0748-5751(98)00010-4
  5. [5] M. Fetters, J. McKenzie, & D. Callaghan, Does the computerhinder accounting education? An analysis of some empiricaldata, Issues in Accounting Education, 1(1), 1986, 76–85.
  6. [6] M.J. Abdolmohammadi, C.D. Brown, D.A. Feldman, M. R. Gu-jarathi, & M. Haselkorn, Designing and implementing anAECC complying introductory accounting course: A four-year perspective, Advances in Accounting Education, 1, 1998,147–162.
  7. [7] A. Sangster, Computer based instruction in accounting, Ac-counting Education, 1(1), 1992, 13–32.
  8. [8] D.F. Togo & A.H. McNamee, Computer integration in account-ing education: Guidelines and pitfalls, Accounting Forum,20(34), 1997, 381–397.
  9. [9] B. Apostolou, S.F. Watson, J.M. Hassell, & S.A. Webber,Accounting education literature review (1997–1999), Journalof Accounting Education, 19(1), 2001, 1–61. doi:10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00010-0
  10. [10] S.G. Strauss, Getting a clue: Communication media and infor-mation distribution effects on group process and performance,Small Group Research, 27(1), 1996, 115–142. doi:10.1177/1046496496271006
  11. [11] J. Seale, J. Chapman, & C. Davey, The influence of assessmentson students motivation to learn in a therapy degree course,Medical Education, 34(8), 2000, 614–621. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00528.x
  12. [12] G. De Vita, Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction inthe multicultural classroom: A business and management per-spective, Innovation in Education and Training International,38(2), 2001, 165–174. doi:10.1080/14703290110035437
  13. [13] N.J. Entwistle, A model of the teaching-learning process, inJohn T.E. Richardson, Michael W. Eysenck, & David W. Piper(Eds.), Student learning, research in education and cognitivepsychology (Buckingham: The Open University Press, 1987),13–28.
  14. [14] R.J. Stevenson & J.A. Palmer, Learning principles, processesand practices (London: Cassell Educational Limited, 1994).
  15. [15] I. Reece & S. Walker, Teaching, Training and Learning: Apractical guide (Sunderland: Business Education Publishers,1994).
  16. [16] R. Clariana, Pace in mastery based computer-assisted learning,British Journal of Education Technology, 28(2), 1997, 135–137. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00017
  17. [17] M.T. Zarzeski, The use and benefit of flexible student contracts,Issues in Accounting Education, 13(3), 1998, 585–594.
  18. [18] Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC), The firstcourse in accounting: Position statement number two, Issuesin Accounting Education, 7(2), 1992, 249–251.
  19. [19] H. Tait & N.J. Entwistle, Identifying students at risk throughineffective study strategies, Higher Education, 31(1), 1996,97–116. doi:10.1007/BF00129109
  20. [20] H. Tait, N.J. Entwistle, & V. McCune, ASSIST: A reconcep-tualisation of the approaches to studying inventory, in C. Rust(Ed.), Improving Student Learning (Oxford: Oxford Centrefor Staff and Learning Development, 1998), 262–271.

Important Links:

Go Back