V. Uskov and A. Uskov


  1. [1] S. Fox, J. Quitney Anderson, & L. Rainie, The future ofthe Internet (Washington, DC: Pew Internet & AmericanLife Project, January 9, 2005), available at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Future_of_Internet.pdf.
  2. [2] R. Abel, Internet supported learning 2005 (Alliance for HigherEducation Competitiveness Inc., February 1, 2005), available athttp://www.a-hec.org/research/study_reports/IsL0205/exec_summ.html.
  3. [3] R.B. Kvavik & J.B. Caruso, ECAR study of student and infor-mation technology, 2005: Convenience, connection, control,and learning, EDUCASE Center for Applied Research, Vol. 6,2005, available at http://www.educase.edu/ecar.
  4. [4] C.J. Bonk, The perfect E-storm: Emerging technologies, enor-mous learner demand, enhanced pedagogy, and erased bud-gets, keynote presentation at Ontario Library Association Su-per Conference, Toronto, Ontario, February 2006, available athttp://www.trainingshare.com/pdfs/SFX57F5.pdf.
  5. [5] C.A. Twigg, Improving learning and reducing costs: Lessonslearned from Round III of the Pew Grant Programme in CourseRedesign, Center for Academic Transformation, RensselaerPolytechnic Institute, available at http://www.thencat.org/PCR/RdIIILessons.pdf.
  6. [6] J. Pulichino, Current trends in e-learning, The elearning Guild,2005, available at http://www.eLearningGuild.com.
  7. [7] Illinois Virtual Campus, available at http://www.ivc.illinois.edu/pubs/enrollment/Fall_05.html.
  8. [8] V. Uskov (Ed.), Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Web-Based Educa-tion, Puerto-Vallarta, Mexico, January 23–25, 2006, availableat http://www. actapress.com/Content_of_Proceeding.aspx?proceedingID=331.

Important Links:

Go Back