A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON POST-CLASS LECTURE VIDEO VIEWING

C.-F. Chiu, G.C. Lee, and J.-H. Yang

References

  1. [1] K.A. Kiewra & R.E. Mayer, Effects of repetition on recall andnote-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures, Journal ofEducatiional Psychology, 83(1), 1991, 120-123. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.120
  2. [2] G.J. Torri Jr., Using video technology as an instructionalstrategy within the elementary science curriculum, Office ofEducation Research and Improvement, ERIC Document Re-production Service No. ED371729, Washington D.C., 1994.
  3. [3] B.A. Ross, S.J. Beckman, & L.H. Meyer, Learning to produce &integrate presentations, video and skills, THE Journal, 23(2),1995, 78–81.
  4. [4] M.V. Doran, T.C. Benson, & H.E. Longenecker Jr., Improvedlearning by use of a video knowledge-base, Proc. of the 30thAnnual Southeast Regional Conf., Raleigh, NC, 1992, 429–432. doi:10.1145/503720.503774
  5. [5] J.D. Bransford, R.D. Sherwood, C.K. Kinzer, & T.S. Hassel-bring, Havens for learning: Toward a framework for developingeffective uses of technology, Office of Educational Researchand Improvement, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED262752, Washington D.C., 1985.
  6. [6] J.B. Rowley & P.M. Hart, How video case studies can promotereflective dialogue, Educational Leadership, 53(6), 1996, 28–29.
  7. [7] S. Mukhopadhyay & B. Smith, Passive capture and structuringof lectures, Proc. of ACM Multimedia, Orlando, FL, 1999,477–487. doi:10.1145/319463.319690
  8. [8] V. Uskov, Design, development and teaching of innovative Web-based introductory “Computer Information Systems course,32th IEEE Int. Conf. on Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA,2002, S1E-13–S1E-18. doi:10.1109/FIE.2002.1158629
  9. [9] N. Joukov & T. Chiueh, Lectern II: A multimedia lecturecapturing and editing system, IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimediaand Expo, Maryland, USA, 2003, II-681-4. doi:10.1109/ICME.2003.1221708
  10. [10] K. Ushijima, Construction and practice of a new educationalenvironment with lecture recording system, IEEE Int. Conf. onAdvanced Information Networking and Application, Fukuoka,Japan, 2004, 12–15. doi:10.1109/AINA.2004.1283880
  11. [11] A.J. Brotherton & G.D. Abowd, Lessons learned from eClass:Assessing automated capture and access in the classroom,ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(2),2004, 121–155. doi:10.1145/1005361.1005362
  12. [12] H.Y. Chen, J.S. Hong, & Y.T. Wu, Design of a Web-basedsynchronized multimedia lecture system for distance education,IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems,Florence, Italy, 1999, 887–891. doi:10.1109/MMCS.1999.778605
  13. [13] S.A. White, A. Gupta, J. Grudin, H. Chesley, G. Kimberly & E.Sanocki, Evolving use of a system for education at a distance,Proc. of the 33rd Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, Islandof Maui, 2000, 1–10.
  14. [14] J.A. Preston & L. Wilson, Offering CS1 on-line reducing campusresource demand while improving the learning environment,ACM SIGCSE (Special Interest Group on Computer ScienceEducation), Charlotte, NC, 2001, 342–346. doi:10.1145/364447.364618
  15. [15] F. Olsen, Business school records lectures and lets studentsreview them online, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(48),2003, A28.
  16. [16] A. Bandura, Social learning theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1977).
  17. [17] A. Bandura, Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs onacademic functioning, Child Development, 67(3), 1996, 1206–1222. doi:10.2307/1131888
  18. [18] G.M. Marakas, M.Y. Yi, & R.D. Johnson, The multileveland multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Towardclarification of the construct and an integrative framework forresearch, Information Systems Research, 9(2), 1998, 126–163.
  19. [19] M. Tasi & C. Tsai, Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy, Inno-vations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 2003,43–50. doi:10.1080/1355800032000038822
  20. [20] M.Y. Yi & Y. Hwang, Predicting the use of web-based in-formation systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal ori-entation, and the technology acceptance model, InternationalJournal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 2003, 431–449. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9
  21. [21] I.T.J. Brown, Individual and technological factors affectingperceived ease of use of Web-based learning technologies in adeveloping country, Electronic Journal on Information Systemsin Developing Countries, 9(5), 2002, 1–15.
  22. [22] C. Ames, Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motiva-tion, Journal of Education Psychology, 84(3), 1992, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  23. [23] J. Harackiewicz, K. Barron, J. Tauer, S. Carter, & A. Elliot,Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals:Predicting interest and performance over time, Journal ofEducational Psychology, 92(2), 2000, 316–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
  24. [24] J.M. Brophy, Fostering student learning and motivation inthe elementary school classroom, in S. Paris, G. Olson, & H.Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom(Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983), 283–305.
  25. [25] M. Grabe, Voluntary use of online lecture notes: Correlates ofnote use and note use as an alternative to class attendance,Computers & Education, 44(4), 2005, 409–421. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.005
  26. [26] RealNetworks Inc., 2006, available at http://www.realnetworks.com
  27. [27] G.C. Lee & M.N. Tsai, An efficient slide-changing detectionalgorithm for MPEG coded lecture videos, Proc. of the 2ndIASTED Int. Conf. on Visualization, Imaging, and ImageProcessing, Malaga, Spain, 2002, 233–238.
  28. [28] R.D. Johnson & G.M. Marakas, The role of behavior modelingin computer skill acquisition—Toward refinement of the model,Information Systems Research, 11(4), 2000, 402–417.202 doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.402.11869

Important Links:

Go Back