L. Reneland-Forsman and T. Ahlbäck


  1. [1] Y. Engeström, Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (Helsinki: Orienta-Kunsultit, 1987).
  2. [2] R. Säljö, Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociolkulturellt perspektiv (Stockholm: Prisma, 2000).
  3. [3] R. Säljö, Lärande & kulturella redskap: Om löroprocesser och det kollektiva minnet (Stockholm: Nordstedt, 2005).
  4. [4] E. Wenger, Communities of practise: Learning, meaning, and identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
  5. [5] P. Dillenbourg, Collaborative learning (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1999).
  6. [6] P. Dillenbourg, What do you mean by “collaborative learning ?, in P Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approach (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1999), 1–19.
  7. [7] K. Littleton & P. Hääkinen, Learning together: Understanding the process of computer-based collaborative learning, in P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approach (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1999),20–30.
  8. [8] L. Vygotskij, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).
  9. [9] T. Koschmann, Paradigm shift and instructional technology, in T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practise of an emerging paradigm (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996), 1–23.
  10. [10] G. Stahl, Rediscovering CSCL, in T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002), 169–181.
  11. [11] D. Laurillard, Rethinking university teaching (London: Routledge Falmer, 2002).
  12. [12] B. Roberts, Interaction, reflection and learning at a distance, Open Learning, 17(1), 2002, 39–55. doi:10.1080/02680510120110166
  13. [13] O. Dysthe, The learning potential of a web-mediated discussion in a university course, Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 2002, 339–352. doi:10.1080/03075070220000716
  14. [14] E.K. Sorensen, Intellectual Amplification through reflection and didactic change in distributed collaborative learning, in C.M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conf., Stanford University, Paola Alto, CA (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999).
  15. [15] M.B. Miles & A.M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 1994).
  16. [16] S. Kvale, Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996).
  17. [17] E. Stacey, Social presence online: Networking learners at a distance, in D. Watson & J. Andersen (Eds.), Networking the learner: Computers in education (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002), 39–48.
  18. [18] A. Sfard, On the two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 1998, 4–13. doi:10.2307/1176193
  19. [19] G. Stahl, Can community knowledge exceed its members’?, SIGGROUP Bulletin, 23 (3), 2002, 3–7.
  20. [20] O. Dysthe, Det flerst¨ammiga klassrummet (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1996).
  21. [21] B. Rogoff, Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, in J.J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvaez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 139–164.

Important Links:

Go Back