Indra Gunawan


  1. [1] S.D. Eppinger, D.E. Whitney, R.P. Smith, and D.A. Gebala,Amodel-based method for organizing tasks in product devel-opment, MIT Sloan School of Management, 1994, 1–20.
  2. [2] S.D. Eppinger and K.T. Ulrich, Product design and develop-ment, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003).
  3. [3] J. Maheswari and K. Varghese, A structured approach to formdependency structure matrix for construction projects, Inter-national Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construc-tion, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, 2005, 1–6.
  4. [4] M.E. Sosa, A structured approach to predicting and managingtechnical interactions in software development, Research inEngineering Design, 19(1), 2008, 47–70.
  5. [5] T. Mori, K. Kondo, K. Ishii, and K. Ohtomi, Task planning forproduct development by strategic scheduling of design reviews,ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas,1999, 1–12.
  6. [6] P. Sage and W.B. Rouse, Handbook of systems engineeringand management (2 ed.) (New York: Wiley, 2009).
  7. [7] T.R. Browning, The many views of a process: Towards a processarchitecture framework for product development processes,Systems Engineering, 12(1), 2009, 69–90.
  8. [8] U. Lindemann, M. Maurer, and T. Braun, Structural complexitymanagement – An approach for the field of product design,(Berlin: Springer, 2009).
  9. [9] A. Yassine, D. Falkenburg, and K. Chelst, Engineering de-sign management and information structure approach, Inter-national Journal of Production Research, 37, 1999, 2957–2975.
  10. [10] A. Yassine, An introduction to modeling and analyzing com-plex product development processes using the design struc-ture matrix (DSM) method, Product Development ResearchLaboratory, University of Illinois, 2004, 1–17.
  11. [11] D. Steward, The design structure matrix: A method formanaging the design of complex systems, IEEE Transactionson Engineering Management, 28(3), 1981, 71–74.
  12. [12] I. Gunawan and K. Ahsan, Project scheduling improvementusing design structure matrix, International Journal of ProjectOrganisation and Management, 2(4), 2010, 311–327.
  13. [13] A. Banerjee, E. Carrillo, and A. Paul, Projects with sequentialiteration: Models and complexity, IIE Transactions, 39(5),2007, 453–463.
  14. [14] T.R. Browning, Applying the design structure matrix to systemdecomposition and integration problems: A review and newdirections, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,48(3), 2001, 292–300.
  15. [15] C. Chen, L. Khoo, and A. Jiao, Information deduction approachthrough quality function deployment for the quantification ofthe dependency between design tasks, International Journalof Production Research, 42, 2004, 4623–4637.
  16. [16] S.H. Cho and S.D. Eppinger, Product development processmodeling using advanced simulation, Design Engineering Tech-nical Conferences, Pittsburgh, 2001, 1–9.
  17. [17] M. Danilovic and T.R. Browning, Managing complex prod-uct development projects with design structure matrices anddomain mapping matrices, International Journal of ProjectManagement, 25(3), 2007, 300–314.
  18. [18] A.A. Yassine, D.E. Whitney, and T. Zambito, Assessment ofrework probabilities for simulating product development usingthe design structure matrix (DSM), ASME International De-sign Engineering Technical Conferences, Pennsylvania, 2001,1–9.
  19. [19] Design Structure Matrix Website,

Important Links:

Go Back